Category: Uncategorized

  • Judge Robinson’s Latest “Gift”: A 44% Hike in Health Insurance Premiums

    Judge Robinson’s Latest “Gift”: A 44% Hike in Health Insurance Premiums

    Yet again, it’s a great day to be a county employee. Our County Judge is the gift that keeps on giving.

    The County just released the health insurance premiums for next year, and let’s just say they’re staggering.

    You can see the chart full of numbers below, but I’ll summarize the damage here. In 2026, a Jefferson County employee with individual coverage will go from paying $79.97 per pay period to $115.37. That’s a 44% increase!

    Family insurance is “only” going up 11%. Lucky them, right? No, that’s because the County has already squeezed every last cent out of our families. It’s going from $818.47 per check to $907.72. That is $21,785.28 a year just for health insurance!

    Major corporate benefits consultant Mercer estimates that “the total health benefit cost per employee is expected to rise 6.5% on average in 2026 – the highest increase since 2010.” Wow, wouldn’t a 6.5% increase be great right about now?

    The Kaiser Family Foundation’s Employer Health Benefits Survey shows that the average US employee with individual coverage pays $1,440 per year ($120/month) out of pocket. In Jefferson County, we are being asked to pay $2,770 per year ($230/month)! How is a discrepancy this huge even possible?

    The company responsible for “negotiating” our health benefits, iOne Benefits Group, Inc. of Southaven, MS, states on their LinkedIn page: “We deliver employee benefit packages and solutions that enhance benefits and increase retention… IBG’s team of Account Managers offer day to day support to you, your HR team, employees, and their families.”

    I’m having a hard time finding a single shred of truth in that mission.

    One thing I do know about iOne Benefits is that they don’t mind buying a little favor with local governments. They donated $350 to the County Judge’s election campaign in 2022. It’s amazing how cheap it is to buy a politician these days.

    As far as I can tell, no effort has been made by the County Judge to find us better pricing, a better provider, or even for the County to help absorb some of this cost. There has been no mention of any of it to the Quorum Court. In fact, I didn’t know how dire the situation was until I received the Review of Benefits yesterday.

    County Employees, make your voices heard. It’s not the first time this year Judge Robinson has failed us. He thought he could get away without paying us, and it cost him $50,000 for that lesson. Now he’s making caring for our families unaffordable.

    This cannot stand.

    Sources:
    Employers are bracing for the highest health benefit cost increase in 15 years, a projected 6.5% increase in 2026, according to Mercer (Employers are bracing for the highest health benefit cost increase in 15 years, a projected 6.5% increase in 2026, according to Mercer)
    2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey (https://www.kff.org/health-costs/2025-employer-health-benefits-survey/#:~:text=The%20average%20annual%20contribution%20amounts,than%20the%20amount%20last%20year.)
    iOne Benefits Group, Inc (https://www.linkedin.com/company/ionebenefits/)

  • Irresponsible County Judge Spends Irresponsibly

    Last night, Judge Gerald Robinson attempted to secure an additional $571,664.29 for his office to cover expenses. The Quorum Court denied the request, prompting him to post on social media this morning criticizing the decision. Below is a screenshot of his post. Let’s examine the finances of the County Judge’s Office to understand why this request was made.

    County government budgets are divided into funds, departments, and groups. For example, line 1000-100-2005 breaks down as follows:

    1000 is the fund (County General), which defines the source of the money.

    100 is the department (County Judge).

    2000 identifies the group, in this case “Supplies.”

    2005 is the specific line item, here used for food purchases by the County Judge’s Office from the General Fund.

    The balance of an individual line does not matter; only the group balance does. For example, lines 2005 and 2007 draw from the same group total. However, funds cannot be moved between groups (e.g., from 2000 to 3000) without Quorum Court approval.

    1000 Group | Personal Services

    Covers employees, benefits, and payroll.
    Original budget: $463,194.68
    Additional appropriation: $3,289.50 (bonus pay ordinance, July)
    Spent: $244,393.51
    Remaining balance: $222,090.67

    This group is well-funded and should last through the year.

    2000 Group | Supplies

    Intended for day-to-day supplies and equipment.
    Original budget: $120,600
    Spent: $32,089.96
    Remaining balance: $88,510.04

    Having 73% of this budget remaining in the tenth month suggests over-funding. It may warrant reduction next year. Despite this, Judge Robinson requested an additional $342.09 for this group, which is inconsistent with the remaining balance.

    Within this group, line 2024 (Maintenance and Service Contracts) retains $79,268.58. Robinson cited unpaid vendors such as Wayne Bixler, Beyond Clean, and Bowman Pest Control. These likely qualify under maintenance or service contracts. In fact, Bowman Pest Control has often been paid from this line. So why are these vendors not being paid now?

    3000 Group | Other Services and Charges

    This group includes services and technology purchases.
    Original budget: $159,462
    Spent: $186,754.84
    Remaining balance: -$27,292.84
    Requested appropriation: $176,523.19

    Spending a group into the negative constitutes spending without an appropriation, which is illegal.

    Key expenses:

    Line 3002 – Management Consulting: $17,812.50 to BSG Communication for phone system consulting.

    Line 3003 – Computer Services: $57,534.36, nearly all to Debose Technologies and Innovations (Elager Debose), who has a felony conviction (case 63CR-23-643). This raises questions about data security.

    Line 3009 – Other Professional Services: $87,123.26 paid to attorneys Terry Wynne, Casey Castleberry, Quattlebaum Grooms & Tull, Burt Newell, and $250 to the Chamber of Commerce.

    These legal costs—driven by Robinson’s ongoing lawsuits—have burdened taxpayers with $87,000 in legal fees. His current request seeks to transfer another $87,123.26 into this same line, which would create a $35,000 surplus for further legal spending.

    4000 Group | Capital Outlay

    Starting budget: $135,000
    Transferred in June to line 5003 (Note Principal)
    Remaining balance: $0

    5000 Group | Debt Service

    For loans and leases.
    Original budget: $672,865
    Additional appropriation: $135,000
    Total appropriation: $807,865
    Spent: $763,062.50
    Remaining balance: $44,802.50

    Major lines:

    5003 Note Principal: $67,687.87

    5004 Note Interest: $223,693.38

    5007 Simmons Bank Loan Payment: $471,681.25

    In total, $763,000 in loan payments have already been made. Yet Robinson seeks another $283,148.87 for additional payments. The county now owes over a million dollars annually on loans, likely for building projects Robinson often highlights. But if these loans were predictable, why did he budget only $672,865? He created this shortfall himself by under-budgeting.

    The Quorum Court has repeatedly sought explanations for the County Judge’s overspending, only to be met with resistance. Their role is to oversee county finances, not rubber-stamp every request. Robinson’s claim that he need not answer their questions contradicts the principle of public accountability. Thirteen Justices of the Peace were elected to ensure that accountability exists.

    Any financial problems in the County Judge’s Office are self-inflicted. Vendors awaiting payment have every right to be frustrated; but the cause lies in mismanagement, not inaction by the Quorum Court.

  • Cannon’s response to his loss

    Mark Cannon could not help but get on his live stream last night to talk about his loss of over $400,000 to Courtney Kelly in a default judgment on Kelly’s defamation lawsuit. Here’s what he said:

    “That lawsuit was filed against me I think in 2023, according to what I’ve read. But guess what, I was never served.”

    You can watch a clip of that video on our Facebook Page.

    The problem is that court documents are public information. Below you can also find a document filed with the clerk’s office that Cannon was in fact served on 6/17/2023. This documents shows that it was served to Martha Cannon, his wife, at his house.

    But let’s pretend that this is a lie for a second and that Mark Cannon had no idea that this lawsuit existed. Then why did he write the court on 8/14/2023 and ask more time to acquire legal counsel? You can’t exactly do that for a lawsuit you don’t know exists.

    It should also be pointed out that his response to the lawsuit was 27 days past the deadline to respond to it. So he was already violating the rules with this first letter.

    What lie do you want to tell the people next, Mark?

  • Judge Wright’s Order

    Let’s talk about the court order that County Judge Gerald Robinson keeps referencing – Judge Wright’s Court Order. You can read the full text of the order below, but here’s the part he loves to quote:

    “4. The Court finds that Jefferson County Quorum Court failed to pass such ordinance not only at its January meeting but continued to violate the clear direction of Arkansas law in subsequent meetings. The evidence presented by testimony and video centered on a meeting held on June 26, 2023. At said meeting the Court heard and saw the utter chaos and discourse of the meeting which resulted in the failed attempt to pass such ordinance. In the meeting held on June 26, 2023, the justices of peace present failed to follow basic procedure by attempting to waive formal reading of a proposed ordinance for purposes of placing the ordinance on second and third reading, and thereby allowing for the vote of the ordinance at the June 26, 2023, meeting. At the time of the vote on the suspension of the rules there were only 7 members present in the body of Jefferson County Quorum Court. The Court finds Arkansas law is clear that to suspend the rules of formal reading of the ordinance requires a 2/3 majority vote of approval by the Quorum Court as a whole, which would have required 9 members present and voting. The Court finds that the procedural ordinance, Ordinance 2023-5 was not properly presented and was not properly approved or enacted.”

    Let’s break that down into plain English:

    1. The Quorum Court didn’t pass a Rules of Procedure ordinance at its January meeting or at any meeting after that.
    2. A video of the June 26, 2023 meeting was shown to the court, where members claimed they had passed the ordinance.
    3. Only 7 of the 13 Justices of the Peace were present.
    4. Those present voted to suspend the rules to avoid reading the ordinance three separate times.
    5. Arkansas law requires 9 votes, 2/3 of the entire Quorum Court, to suspend the rules. Seven votes wasn’t enough.
    6. Because they didn’t follow the required procedure, the ordinance wasn’t properly approved.

    In short: Jefferson County hasn’t had a valid Rules of Procedure ordinance in place for all of 2023, 2024, and part of 2025.

    So, what do we do with that information? In my view, there are two options:

    1. Treat everything passed by the Quorum Court between January 1, 2023, and April 7, 2025, as invalid — every ordinance, every appropriation, voided like it never happened.
    2. Recognize the chaos that would create, move forward, and pass a new ordinance affirming the validity of actions taken during that time.

    Here’s the irony: either everything from the past two years is valid, or none of it is. Judge Robinson loves to cite Section 4 of the order when he disagrees with the Quorum Court.  But when he’s getting what he wants? Silence. If the order invalidates Quorum Court actions, then that includes the millions in appropriations made to his office. Yet he’s had no issue spending that “illegal” money; and he still asks for more every year, with nothing but excuses when the bills aren’t paid.

    One last point: Judge Wright’s order doesn’t actually order anyone to do anything. It doesn’t explain how the county should proceed without rules. It just says the ordinance wasn’t passed properly. That’s it. No commentary on how this affects county operations going forward.

    In closing, stop taking Judge Robinson at his word when he says everything the Quorum Court is doing is illegal. That’s not what the order says. Read it yourself, then call him on his nonsense.